About Me

Name: Matthew
Location: Woodstock, GA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

if the shoe were on the other hand...

Please, join me as we step inside the mind of the president-elect as he becomes the target of a drive-by shoeing...

Hmm. That man over to the right - looks like he's waving. You know, most people wave from side to side; he appears to be waving from front to back.

Oh, I see. He wasn't waving; he was winding up to throw something at me. Hmm. It, uh, appears to be a shoe.

Interesting. That shoe looks to be a bit worn at the heel. I need to consult with Rahm about whether we have made any promises to the leather-workers' union.

Throwing a shoe is probably an indication of discontent. Maybe if I take Sean Hannity up on his offer to buy me a beer, people wouldn't be throwing shoes.

I probably ought to consider some course of action to avoid actually being struck by the shoe; it appears to be aimed at my head, and I believe that would hurt.

Do I have any advisors on shoe-avoidance? It seems like I should have someone to advise me on situations like this.

I wonder if Hillary ever had to dodge shoes in Bosnia. Seems like she would have said something about it.

Hmm. The shoe is getting much closer now. Looks like Italian leather. Can't say anything bad about the shoe, now; it might be perceived as being an insult to the Italians.

Oh, look at that stitchi...ow.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thought for the day: When in Cairo...

I understand the president-elect is scheduling a trip to Cairo.

I offer the following suggestion as a drinking game you can play for whichever of his speeches is televised:

The following phrases are thrown into a hat, and each person draws a phrase. When their selected phrase crosses the teleprompter, er , is spoken, the player takes a shot/drink. The phrases:

- "religion of peace"
- "tolerance"
- "hope" (or "change")
- "terrorism"

The person who draws "terrorism" will be the designated driver for the evening.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thought for the day: It takes a village ...

... to raise an idiot.

It takes at least one person and minimal attention to raise a child.

It takes an incredible amount of patience, discipline, and selfless love to raise a person worthy of respect.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thought for the Day, 12/03/08

There is no "I" in "TEAM"; but there is one smack dab in the middle of "WIN."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Powder to the People

Today's DC Examiner includes an interesting article; 'Happy' Harry Reid is glowing because the new congressional visitors' center has opened. Harry is pleased because he will no longer have to smell the 'tourists' coming to watch the Senate.

If he had a sense of humor, I would think the Senator was joking; but in the absence of any evidence of said humor, I have to assume he is being honest. At least he is candid.

The comments that have already been attached to the article are fairly complete in their outrage, and follow a few specific themes:
  • The Capital is ours, not his
  • He works for us
  • We are called 'citizens' and 'taxpayers,' not 'tourists'
There are also some comments that question the source of the odor he has been smelling, but those get a little distasteful (oh, sure, I laughed; but I felt embarassed afterward).

Reid represents the common man. He just doesn't want to smell one.

He is a leader in the party of the people - as long as they have recently bathed.

He speaks his mind, which leaves him with little to say.

He is a giant...among molecules.

Take heart, good people. Harry and the gang are relaxing now that they see themselves as being in charge. More politically-astute comments are sure to flow over the next few years, and (eventually) he and his ilk will say a little too much of what they really think.
I just hope someone will report it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

another freakin' top ten list

Oxford has released its list of the top ten irritating phrases, an annual exercise in futility. Futile, because this seems to spur many to use the phrases just that much more heartily.

Now that the presidential campaign is behind us, I offer a list of phrases and concepts of which I hope to never hear again - largely because they have outlived their collective shelf life and need to be thrown away. Or at least put into the recycling bin.

10. nuanced - It is one thing to be able to understand a variety of viewpoints on any given issue; it is quite another to apparently adopt none of these viewpoints as one's own. That is not 'nuanced'; that is indecisive.

9. vote suppression - It is apparently only 'suppression' when one tries to make sure the only people voting are in compliance with applicable laws. Speaking of which...

8. the Constitutional right to vote - The U.S. Constitution says that the method of selecting the electors will be left at the discretion of the various states. There are certainly Amendments which limit the ability of the states to deny anyone voting on the basis of gender or race; but there is no Constitutional right to vote. It is a privilege endowed by the states.

7. unrepentant terrorist - Don't misunderstand; I think the William Ayers thing was never fleshed out the way it should have been; but that phrase has become a punch-line, specifically because it was usually thrown around without supporting quotes, documentation, or any other reason for the wide-eyed faithful to understand what the deal was. It's okay to resurrect this one if Mr. Ayers becomes the minister of Peace and Justice in the new administration.

6. My friends - especially when used by someone I've never met.

5. Historic - Every time we change who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue without shots being fired, that is an historic event. So is each World Series and Superbowl, if you believe the folks selling the videos of those events. So is each day through  which I pass without thumping a liberal on the earlobe. Virtually everything that happens has some impact on history. If I had a quarter for every time I heard the election referred to as "historic," I'd...well, I'd have a lot of change. Change that I could believe in, I think.

4. distractions - A humorous story or a crossword puzzle may be a distraction; an issue that deserves an answer is not.

3. Community organizer - I have an organizer on my desk; it holds my car keys, a red stapler, and a collection of paper clips. I also have an organizer that I sometimes carry to track appointments and tasks to be completed (these were once known as 'calendars').

2. Failed policies - Okay in the insurance industry, unless it relates to your personal health insurance. Dropping this phrase will leave Nancy Pelosi with very little to say; but would anyone notice?

1. Change - unless used in the context of diapers or tires, I'm over this one.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

so now we wait...

About once every generation, we do this. We hand control of the country - lock, stock, and barrel - to our liberal brethren.

It lasts for two to four years, and then we swear we'll never do that again.

But we do. We forget.

So now we wait and see.

"Dance with the one who brung ya," goes the old saying. President Obama will have to choose between the ones who brung him to Washington and through the primaries, versus those who elected him. I have my doubts and suspicions, but I choose to grit my teeth and hope for the best. Meanwhile, I'll keep teaching my kids the truths that seem lost on so many, and I'll continue to try to win people's minds and hearts toward the mindset that America is neither about what we can get out of it nor what it can pull from us.

The pendulum swings. I believe in two years the electorate, when they realize they're still paying for their gas and mortgage, will toss most of the new bums out.

Meanwhile, I'm not going to go out of my way to insult those who disagree with me on the major issues; emotion is what got us where we are this morning.





Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A silent, but cushiony-soft, protest

Many thanks to the representatives who remembered Monday who they are representing. Long may you occupy your office. At least until you fall under the influence of the high lead content in the D.C. water.

I have thought long and hard about what the lowly taxpayer could do that would adequately express the collective disgust many of us feel about the Socialization of our nation. My inspiration came from Mike Baker's "People's Weekly Brief,"in which the author referred to the high-volume of "poo-flinging" currently occupying many of our political leaders. I was reading that when it hit me.

Pick six representatives from the list of those who voted in favor of the bailout plan. Or ten, if you want to go with the super-size pack.

Then send each of them a roll of toilet paper. Jumbo-sized. Get some of that John Wayne TP - the kind that's rough, tough, and won't take crud off anyone. If you want to attach a note explaining which mess they should be cleaning up, all the better.

Oh, I know, we are getting close to the election. You might be afraid that your package wouldn't arrive in time to do any good, to send a message before the election.

But fear not; we'll send 95% of the group right back to continue dumping on us.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Ike Spike - It's a Gas, Gas, Gas

The focus of the media regarding the aftermath of Hurricane Ike is, and should be, on the rescue and repair operations. Ike may not have been a killer anywhere near the extent of other historic storms, but my brother in central Illinois had flooding in his house and my mom lost some trees outside Cincinnati. This storm made a lot of noise for being Cat 2 at landfall.

We here in Atlanta are experiencing a different side effect. Over the weekend I saw long lines at gas stations, and increasing numbers on the signs in front of the stations. On my way to the gym and work this morning, I passed a dozen gas stations with gas nozzles wrapped in plastic, the universal sign for "no dice" at the pump. The pipeline that runs from the Houston shipping channel and across the Gulf states, the one which feeds our fuel fixes here, is shut down.

This happened when Rita went through a couple of years ago. She did what mighty Katrina could not do to the southeast and the eastern seaboard. We went on a starvation diet, though short-lived.

This brings up something I've been advocating for the last few years. I know this is impractical, that no one would approach this seriously...but that's never stopped me before.

The southeastern section of New Orleans should be levelled, and turned into a new refinery.

I have a family member who grew up there, who has as strong of an attachment to that bit of flood-prone bog as any. She has been back since Katrina; she knows it is not the same place it once was, and likely never will be. Should not be, is really more to the point.

The factors that make New Orleans' southeastern residential area such a likely target for devestation are largely the same factors that would make it near ideal for increasing our national refinery capacity.

Easy access to the navigable Mississippi could take some of the strain off the Houston refineries, and spread the risk over a much larger area in case of a weather tragedy. I don't know the exact course of the Colonial pipeline, but I know it is not far from NO. Connecting into that network would be a minimal cost relative to building in some area that is far from existing pipe. Floridans are now beginning to join the chant to allow off-shore - how much would transport risks be minimized if the refinery were just down the coast rather than across the gulf?

I understand that many have an attachment to homes in the area in question, and I would not encourage the government to force this action. I think it would be in the selfish interests of one of the majors in the oil industry to consider and pursue such a course.

It would be easy to dismiss the idea as the musings of another oil-addicted whiner. Or one could think about the implications of having so many of our energy eggs in one proverbial basket, and easily think through the national security implications of having a large section of the nation completely tied to one major source.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Here Piggy, Piggy

The Obama campaign set off a firestorm yesterday with the repetition of the old saying, "If you put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig."

The McCain campaign was quick to jump on the statement as sexist, the Obama campaign reminded us that McCain used the same saying referring to one of Hillary's proposed policies, and the 24-hour news cycle was protected for another day from political fatigue.

Whatever else one might say about Obama, he isn't an idiot. I don't buy the line that he was showing sexism with this comment, as he was referring not to Palin but to some of the policies of the (R)s. One can find plenty of other examples of Obama's sexism that don't require much of a reach (Right, Sweetie?). So what was this man who is so careful with words saying?

One of the ripples that is spreading from the Palin nomination is the recognition that Palin's strongest appeal is to the group of people least likely to be affected by the snobbish denigrations of the media - the average American. Obama is trying to be "a little bit country," as Marie Osmond used to sing. He is trying very hard to be Main Street instead of Hyde Park. He is trying to connect/reconnect with the American midwest, the place where people can use the pig analogy without anyone thinking the speaker sexist.

If you approach his comments from that perspective, the "pig" comment is about as likely as Paris Hilton working on a farm. The visual doesn't work; and you get the feeling that, once the cameras are off, the "star" runs to the shower as quickly as possible. Got to get that demeaning stench off. That stench of commonness.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attacking Palin, Phase Three

Winston Churchill said, "You have enemies? Good. That means you have stood up for something, sometime in your life."

I was reading an opinion piece from the NY Times online. I apologize; I know each hit on their site just encourages them, but sometimes I can't help myself. The piece was written by Judith Warner, and was attacking (drum roll please) the nomination of Sarah Palin as insulting to women.

Hardly news, right?

I saw an entirely new reason presented for women to hate Gov. Palin. Warner says that it is shameful that the discussion of a female candidate has devolved to her childcare needs and breast pumps.

I agree that is shameful. But who was it that started that discussion? Let's rebuild the time line.

Palin is announced on Friday, August 29th, before noon.

Within the hour, the Obama campaign announces its disapproval of McCain's selection of a person whose experience is that of a "small-town mayor." Stop giggling. I know, she's a governor. I know, he should never deride anyone else on "experience."

By 8:00 that night, John Major at CNN has asked about whether she is a fit mother.

By noon on Saturday, most of the media has figured out the experience thing goes in a direction they should avoid, so they focus on the "bad mother" angle.

To be fair, some were asking legit questions about Palin's record and her stand on national-level issues. To those who focused there, thanks for doing your job.

But it was the press that made her family's recent and pending maternities an issue.

So now feminists are supposed to be mad at Palin because some members of the press are mysogynysts.

The whole thing makes me dizzy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media Apologies

I saw an article on Politico a little earlier where the author was mocking the idea that the media owed Sarah Palin an apology. The article was well-written sarcasm. Made me want to write, "It's a human thing; you wouldn't understand."

If anyone is asking the media to apologize for questions about Palin's position on issues, I'm not aware of it.

If anyone is suggesting that the media crossed the line by doing any research into what folks in Alaska think about her - both her supporters and detractors - they're mistaken.

The issue is not that the media asked questions. I don't even think her family (or Obama's) should be off limits.

The point where the "media elites" crossed the line was when questions started to come up that would never be asked of Barack Obama. Or John McCain, for that matter.

The idea that CNN's Campbell Brown (one of many, sadly) would question Palin's fitness to serve because of her recent maternity is mind-boggling to me. The idea that a reporter would use the euphamistic "Some would say..." to cover the fact that the specific reporter is the Some in that statement is ridiculous. The idea that being the mother of a pregnant, unwed teen in any way reflects on Palin's ability to lead...sheez!

Apparently, many members of the press are closet Puritans. Who knew.

It is also apparent that they were never teenagers, never went through that time of life where the idea of parental respect usually goes on vacation for a few years.

In today's society if two of Gov. Palin's five kids remain unscarred by promiscuity prior to marriage, she's beating the odds, regardless of what she teaches.

I also saw an article today on ABC's site repeating the claim that Sarah had once belonged the the Independent Alaska Party. There was a quote waaaaaaay down at the bottom of the article from the woman who leads that party saying she already made it clear that wasn't true. How's that for responsible journalism?

And what of "Troopergate"? Heard yet that no one claims she was involved in the pressure on the appointee? Heard yet that the issue was an abusive father who tasered his stepson? As I wrote elsewhere, anyone involved in getting that thug out of a cop's uniform should get a medal, not an investigation.

If the media wants to ask about issues that relate to the job she's vying for, I say more power to 'em. But taking the easy way out by looking for excuses to dismiss her rather than weighing her experience and growth in her political life is not Pulitzer material.

Am I sold on her as the very best qualified person for the Veep slot on the ticket? Don't know. Don't care. She is the candidate; second-guessing that now seems kinda pointless to me. If the McCain campaign had asked my opinion, my suggestion would have been even wackier than a moose-hunting beauty queen.

I think she brings a lot to the ticket, and I know that's why people are usually selected for the junior spot. Selecting her was no more cynical or desparate than was Kennedy choosing LBJ, or Obama choosing Biden.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just A Distraction...That Works

Senator Obama is spending a lot of time explaining how superior the amount and type of experience he has compares to that of Gov. Palin.

The Senator has a legendary ability to focus and ignore things he calls "distractions." I'll not attempt to list all of the things that have been dismissed as distractions in this political season, since that list would be a distraction in and of itself, but I'm sure you've heard the term "distraction" thrown about once or twice regarding things you thought might be real issues.

However, he does not seem to be able to find that focus, that inner voice, when it comes to the comparisons between himself and Gov. Palin.

He is fixated.

He has to keep coming up with examples of how he is better than she.

His campaign staff has a budget 36 times that of Palin's mayoral town. He manages 1200 people - she only managed 60-ish, maybe.

Ignoring the issue that he has a campaign manager and chief of staff who are primarily responsible for the things he is taking credit for handling, and that she is a governor now (not just a small-town mayor), it still fascinates me to watch his responses.

One does not respond so vorasciously out of casual dismissal; one does it out of fear.

So what fears could there be that would explain this behavior?
  • Mysogyny has to be a major suspect. The idea that anyone could compare him to this woman, and maybe give her some respectability in the balance, might be more than he can take.
  • His own need to prove himself is a driving force. There was an interesting article in the Chicago Trib last week about how Obama is always requiring more of himself ("Must do better" was the catch-phrase in the piece), is very driven to rise to the top of whatever arena he enters. He has a right to this presidency. He is supposed to walk up and just claim the throne, because he is smarter, better-looking, and more urbane than his opponent. And now people dare to compare him to this backwoods, gun-toting, fisherman's wife-beauty queen? How dare they.
  • His inner voices/doubts, which are usually behind both mysogyny and an (artificially) high level of personal drive, could be a factor. When he selected Joe Biden as his running mate, many saw an indication that he saw his own weakness in experience and foreign policy. His introduction of Biden as "The next President of the United States" was also seen as a Freudian slip, as if to say, "I know I'm not worthy; how about this guy?". Most people who are subconsciously unsure of themselves eventually turn to tearing others down in order to make themselves look better, or at least to feel better. I sense a lot of that in his attacks on Palin.
If I didn't already find Palin's candidacy just the right tonic for the McCain ticket, this would seal the deal for me. Any time you can get a presidential candidate to keep comparing himself to your veep choice, that's a good thing - especially if that Presidential candidate is already struggling with appearing presidential. Obama is off message, and is beginning to show some desparation in his attacks. I don't think Mr. Obama can stop himself.

No He Can't.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gustav an Opportunity

I offer an unsolicited suggestion to Mr. McCain and his crew regarding the RNC. Few people really care about the convention, other than those who are supposed to attend. Much of the middle seems to buy the idea that conservatives are heartless.

So what if the RNC convenes in New Orleans (or wherever Gustav hits) and spends most of the time doing emergency relief, clean up and rebuilding? Tell the network people they are welcome if they also come to help, but this is not to be a photo op.

Unless the Ron Paul people have perfected a plan to take over the convention, I can't imagine anyone but the vendors in St. Paul being upset by the change of plans.

Realistic? Probably not. But I can dream.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palin by Comparison

When John McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate yesterday, the energy level of conservatives spiked as it has not in 20 years. It has been a long time since we were able to look at the Republican Party's leadership and not feel a little stung by the "rich old white guy" rhetoric of the left (not that they had much room for pointing fingers, mind you). It has been a long time since we were able to see someone up there who really lives like one of us.

The immediate take on the MSM was that this was a play for the Clinton backers, the PUMAs. I beg to differ. While the left chose to interpret her introductory speech as a play for those voters, I saw it as an honest recognition that her presence on that stage did owe itself to a couple of women who, whether we all agree with their ideals or not, have opened the door for other women to raise their voices in politics. It is fitting, when you look at how Palin has truly reached across the aisle in filling her cabinet and in getting legislation through the Alaskan legislature, that she would mention those who made the "glass ceiling" appear not-so-thick.

Susan Estrich, a liberal Fox News contributor, had an article up almost as soon as Palin's name was out stating how the Republicans had another think coming if they thought women would flock to Palin. That was demeaning to women, sayeth Estrich, to think that they would vote based on anatomy. I agree. That is condescension at the same level as assuming that someone might vote for a candidate based on pigmentation.

Palin deserves a closer look not because she is a woman, but because she was willing to take on the criminals in her own party.

She deserves consideration because she is not the normal product of the slow-grinding political machine that turns smart people into bobble-headed mouthpieces.

She deserves consideration because she recognizes that being a representative of the people is a priviledge, and that it does not deserve priviledges.

She deserves consideration because she walks the talk - she knew the likelihood of her baby being born with developmental issues, but stayed true to her beliefs (and Trig isn't a showpiece for her; he is a blessing).

She deserves consideration because she is skin-and-bones evidence that conservativism is not dead.

Strange that it took John McCain to bring us Sarah Palin.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »